Which probe is better.? Mach Discussion > General Mach Discussion Which probe is better.?

DeskCNC is a Windows based CAM/CNC solution for creating toolpaths, copying existing models, and running CNC machines. DeskCNC can create toolpaths from DXF STL, Gerber, Excellon, and Image file formats as well as Digitize existing part geometr (requires optional Probe or Laser Scanner). Includes fully licensed DeskCNC Cam and Controller software compatible with Windows 98 or later operating system running on your computer with a serial or USB port. Easy CNC training book.

Stronghold crusader 4 trainer. (1/2) jevs: I am looking for a probe to do digitizing and also edge and center finding etc. Which of these is better or more accurate?

Or should I be looking for something better? If so what would it be? Hood: Check out Zarzuls probe, you will find the thread in the bargain basement section of the forum. Hood jevs: I beleive his probe is the first one I linked to at Wildhorse? Idm crack download.

I read all those posts, but I still don't know which of the two is better. One is nearly 3 times as expensive, but is it better (more accurate or better repeatability)? Also are these probes even any good for edge finding, or are they not accurate enough? Hood: I made my own probe and its very accurate, it is along the same lines as the ones you linked to, ie the 3 rod and ball type. I dont use it for probing and it was never my intention to use it for that, it was made for edge finding and is extremely repeatable, I have it true to less than 0.005mm and it will repeat at less than I can measure.

So from that I would say there is no reason to think either of the two above would be any different. Hood BR549: I have used the IMSRV model for over 5 years without fail and it is VERY accurate.

(;-) TP Navigation [0] [#].